Training Evaluation: Understanding and Intervening in Sibling Sexual Behaviors and Abuse

(OT260) Training Evaluation: Understanding and Intervening in Sibling Sexual Behaviors and Abuse

Training Name: Understanding and Intervening in Sibling Sexual Behaviors and Abuse

Date: March 6, 2025

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Analyze current theory and practice in relation to sibling sexual behavior.
2) Apply a mapping tool to design and deliver effective and culturally appropriate services to children, youths, and families where sibling sexual abuse has occurred.
3) Evaluate the role of family systems in understanding, responding to, and preventing sibling sexual behaviors and abuse.
4) Describe the lived experiences and perspectives of adult survivors of sibling sexual abuse.
5) Analyze the existing research literature on sibling sexual behaviors and abuse.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1 Rate the first instructor’s (Sophie King-Hill) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2 Rate the second instructor’s (Kieran McCartan) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.3 Rate the third instructor’s (David Russell) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1 Rate the first instructor’s (Sophie King-Hill) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2 Rate the second instructor’s (Kieran McCartan) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.3 Rate the third instructor’s (David Russell) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Analyze current theory and practice in relation to sibling sexual behavior.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Apply a mapping tool to design and deliver effective and culturally appropriate services to children, youths, and families where sibling sexual abuse has occurred.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Evaluate the role of family systems in understanding, responding to, and preventing sibling sexual behaviors and abuse.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Describe the lived experiences and perspectives of adult survivors of sibling sexual abuse.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Analyze the existing research literature on sibling sexual behaviors and abuse.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all