Training Evaluation: Effective Writing and Publishing in the Field of Violence Prevention

(NOT128) Training Evaluation: Effective Writing and Publishing in the Field of Violence Prevention

Training Name: Effective Writing and Publishing in the Field of Violence Prevention

Date: February 18, 2025

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Evaluate and select optimal outlets for their publications that align with their research and practice ideas.
2) Demonstrate proficiency in crafting clear, objective, and unbiased written content.
3) Explain effective strategies for collaborating with editors and publishers throughout the publication process.
4) Analyze audience needs and tailor submissions to maximize their relevance and impact.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Jill Levenson) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Kelly Socia) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.3. Rate the third instructor’s (David Prescott) knowledge and expertise of the subject. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Jill Levenson) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Kelly Socia) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.3. Rate the third instructor’s (David Prescott) teaching ability. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
8. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
9. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
10. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
11. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all