Training Evaluation: Evidence-Informed Treatment of Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder: A Strengths-Based Approach

(OT220-A) Evaluation – Evidence-Informed Treatment of Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder: A Strengths-Based Approach

Training Name: Evidence-Informed Treatment of Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder: A Strengths-Based Approach

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) List the defining features of CSBD
2) Identify the predominant ways in which CSBD has been conceptualized and how this is relevant for both assessment and treatment
3) Explain the critical issues related to both reducing risk for future sexual offending and managing CSBD
4) Describe methods for treating CSBD
5) Explain the characteristics of effective treatment providers

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Drew A. Kingston, PhD, ATSAF 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Liam E. Marshall, Ph.D., RP, ATSAF) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Drew A. Kingston, PhD, ATSAF) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Liam E. Marshall, Ph.D., RP, ATSAF) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “List the defining features of CSBD” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Identify the predominant ways in which CSBD has been conceptualized and how this is relevant for both assessment and treatment” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Explain the critical issues related to both reducing risk for future sexual offending and managing CSBD” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4 . Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4 : “Describe methods for treating CSBD” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Explain the characteristics of effective treatment providers” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Drew A. Kingston, PhD, ATSAF) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
13.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Liam E. Marshall, Ph.D., RP, ATSAF) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all