Training Evaluation: Treatment with Adults Who Have Sexually Abused

(OT235-A) Training Evaluation: Treatment with Adults Who Have Sexually Abused

Course Name: Treatment with Adults Who Have Sexually Abused

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:

1) Apply the “going upstream” method of finding motivations and strategies for making positive changes.
2) Differentiate among “approach goals” in treatment planning.
3) Describe ten “primary human goods” or “good life goals” that appear to be relevant to all human beings.
4) Explain how the pursuit of “primary human goods” or “good life goals” can serve as motivators for sexual abuse by adults.
5) Describe how early adversity can develop into risk factors for sexual abuse by adults.
6) Use scaling questions for assessing internal motivation to achieve good life goals.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s (David Prescott, LICSW ATSA-F) knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s (David Prescott, LICSW ATSA-F) teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Apply the “going upstream” method of finding motivations and strategies for making positive changes.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Differentiate among “approach goals” in treatment planning.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe ten “primary human goods” or “good life goals” that appear to be relevant to all human beings.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Explain how the pursuit of “primary human goods” or “good life goals” can serve as motivators for sexual abuse by adults.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Describe how early adversity can develop into risk factors for sexual abuse by adults.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Use scaling questions for assessing internal motivation to achieve good life goals.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (David Prescott, LICSW ATSA-F) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all