Training Evaluation: Strengths-Based Intervention Planning for Desistance from Sexual Offending

(OT224-A) Evaluation – Strengths-Based Intervention Planning for Desistance from Sexual Offending

Course Name: Strengths-Based Intervention Planning for Desistance from Sexual Offending

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Explain key elements of desistance theory.
2) Critique definitions of protective factors.
3) Describe a structured measure of protective factors (SAPROF-SO).
4) Explain how the SAPROF-SO can inform treatment and release planning decisions.
5) Explain the Good Lives Model.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Gwenda M. Willis) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Sharon Kelley) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.3. Rate the third instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (David Thornton) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Gwenda M. Willis) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Sharon Kelley) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.3. Rate the third instructor’s teaching ability (David Thornton) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Explain key elements of desistance theory.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Critique definitions of protective factors.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe a structured measure of protective factors (SAPROF-SO).” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Explain how the SAPROF-SO can inform treatment and release planning decisions.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Explain the Good Lives Model.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the first instructor’s (Gwenda M. Willis) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive
14. Rate the second instructor’s (Sharon Kelley) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive
15. Rate the third instructor’s (David Thornton) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive
16. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all