Training Evaluation: Cultural Humility in Correctional Assessment and Treatment (OT160-A) (OT160-A) Evaluation – Cultural Humility in Correctional Assessment and Treatment In order to receive social work credit, you must provide your name and email address. If you seek only psychology credits, you have the option to remain anonymous. Please select your preference below: * Include name and email addressRemain anonymous and receive a psychology certificate only Email * Last Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate) * First Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate) * License Number, if applicable (for identity verification purposes) Issuing state/province, if applicable Which of the following best describes you? * Select OnePsychologistSocial WorkerCounselorStudentNone of the above I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate. * I agree 1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little * 5 4 3 2 1 2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all * 5 4 3 2 1 4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all * 5 4 3 2 1 5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met? Learning Objective #1: “Identify therapist implicit biases and demonstrate knowledge on how to become a culturally humble professional,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met? Learning Objective #2: “Identify broad sociocultural (i.e., racial/ethnic, language, religion, gender/gender identity, sexual orientation, and disability) factors that influence individuals who have committed sexual offenses,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met? Learning Objective #3: “Describe how cultural differences in attitudes and beliefs about sexually inappropriate behavior,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met? Learning Objective #4: “Describe important diversity considerations for assessment and treatment,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met? Learning Objective #5: “Explain the utility of psychological and risk assessment methods with a diverse patient population,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met? Learning Objective #6: “Describe and discuss important cultural factors for treatment and management,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.7. Would you agree that learning objective #7 was met? Learning Objective #7: “Identify common micro-aggressions in correctional settings,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.8. Would you agree that learning objective #8 was met? Learning Objective #8: “Identify elements of a professional development plan for cultural humility,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all * 5 4 3 2 1 9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all * 5 4 3 2 1 N/A 12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult * 5 4 3 2 1 13. Rate the instructor(s) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all * 5 4 3 2 1 14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all * 5 4 3 2 1 15. How will the information from this program be useful to you in the future? * 16. What did the program (or presenter/s) do particularly well that helped you understand the material? * 17. What, if anything, could the program (or presenter/s) have done differently to help you understand the material better? * 18. About how long did it take you to complete this course (including completing this form)? * 19. OPTIONAL: How did you learn about this training? 20. OPTIONAL: What country are you from? 21. OPTIONAL: Do you have any additional thoughts or comments you’d like to share with us? Submit If you are human, leave this field blank. Δ
