Training Evaluation: Managing Unhealthy Sexual Arousal: A Sex-Positive Approach to Treatment

(OT303-A) Training Evaluation – Managing Unhealthy Sexual Arousal: A Sex-Positive Approach to Treatment

Training Name: Managing Unhealthy Sexual Arousal: A Sex-Positive Approach to Treatment

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Apply sex-positive techniques to treatment of adults who have committed sexual offenses 
2) Explain arousal management practices to clients in treatment 
3) Describe how to adapt the teaching of arousal management approaches for clients with special needs

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Ted Jackson, LCSW, PhD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Bud Ballinger, PhD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Ted Jackson, LCSW, PhD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Bud Ballinger, PhD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Apply sex-positive techniques to treatment of adults who have committed sexual offenses” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Explain arousal management practices to clients in treatment ” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe how to adapt the teaching of arousal management approaches for clients with special needs” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Ted Jackson, LCSW, PhD) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
13.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Bud Ballinger, PhD) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all