Training Evaluation: Living with Children Evaluations: Assessing Whether Adults with Sexual-Offense Histories Can Safely Live with Children

(OT285-A) Training Evaluation – Living with Children Evaluations: Assessing Whether Adults with Sexual-Offense Histories Can Safely Live with Children

Training Name: Living with Children Evaluations: Assessing Whether Adults with Sexual-Offense Histories Can Safely Live with Children

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Describe best practices in sexual offense risk assessment
2) Consider legal requirements while using best practices for forensic evaluation
3) Explain how a targeted LWC assessment differs from more traditional risk assessments
4) Create individualized recommendations in challenging situations

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Zachary Yeoman, PsyD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability (Zachary Yeoman, PsyD) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe best practices in sexual offense risk assessment” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Consider legal requirements while using best practices for forensic evaluation” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Explain how a targeted LWC assessment differs from more traditional risk assessments ” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Create individualized recommendations in challenging situations” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Zachary Yeoman, PsyD) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all