Training Evaluation: How to Use “Ask-Offer-Ask” as a Brief Motivational Interviewing Intervention

(OT270-A) Evaluation – How to Use “Ask-Offer-Ask” as a Brief Motivational Interviewing Intervention

Training Name: How to Use “Ask-Offer-Ask” as a Brief Motivational Interviewing Intervention

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Explain how conversations get stuck, and what professionals can do next
2) Use AOA to share information, facilitate decision-making, and guide conversations in a manner that avoids making people feel lectured, talked down to, or forced into something
3) Explain common traps that helpers fall into when trying to get people on board with a plan or suggested course of action
4) Describe how to use the structure of AOA in moments of uncertainty, stress, and emotional overload to maintain productive dialog

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Alexander Waitt, LPC, MS, MSEd) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Sarah Cameron, MS, CTTS, NBC-HWC) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Alexander Waitt, LPC, MS, MSEd) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Sarah Cameron, MS, CTTS, NBC-HWC) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Explain how conversations get stuck, and what professionals can do next” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Use AOA to share information, facilitate decision-making, and guide conversations in a manner that avoids making people feel lectured, talked down to, or forced into something” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Explain common traps that helpers fall into when trying to get people on board with a plan or suggested course of action” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Describe how to use the structure of AOA in moments of uncertainty, stress, and emotional overload to maintain productive dialog” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13.1. Rate the first instructor’s (Alexander Waitt, LPC, MS, MSEd) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
13.2. Rate the second instructor’s (Sarah Cameron, MS, CTTS, NBC-HWC) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive*
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all