Training Evaluation: Understanding ADHD in Adolescents Who Display Harmful Sexual Behavior

(NOT127) Training Evaluation: Understanding ADHD in Adolescents Who Display Harmful Sexual Behavior

Training Name: Understanding ADHD in Adolescents Who Display Harmful Sexual Behavior

Date: February 27, 2025

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Describe ADHD and its subtypes
2) Describe difficulties individuals often experience in coming to terms with an ADHD diagnosis
3) Explain ADHD’s impact on adolescents in general with a particular focus on those displaying harmful sexual behavior.
4) Identify the overlapping of symptoms of ADHD and triggers for HSB that complicates treatment.
5) Utilize practical, compassionate strategies and treatment approaches for ADHD in adolescents displaying HSB.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor(s) knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor(s) teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
8. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
9. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
10. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
11. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all