Evaluation Form: Trauma-Informed Care in High-Security Settings (OT208-A)


(OT208-A) Evaluation – Trauma-Informed Care in High-Security Settings
I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very Current/Relevant, 1 = Not Current/Relevant
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Jill Levenson) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (David Prescott) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Jill Levenson) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (David Prescott) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Explain the components of trauma-informed care.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe complex trauma and its contribution to illegal behaviors.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe common adverse experiences in the backgrounds of clients in high-security settings.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Use strategies for improving assessments and treatment responsivity with clients who have experienced trauma and adversity.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Apply trauma-informed skills to engage these clients meaningfully in treatment.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Integrate trauma-responsive concepts into program content and therapeutic process.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor’s (Jill Levenson) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive
14. Rate the instructor’s (David Prescott) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very Responsive, 1 = Not responsive
15. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all