Training Evaluation: Ethical and Clinical Issues in Treating Non-Justice-Involved People with Pedophilia and/or Hebephilia

(OT123-A) Evaluation – Ethical and Clinical Issues in Treating Non-Justice-Involved People with Pedophilia and/or Hebephilia

Course Name: Ethical and Clinical Issues in Treating Non-Justice-Involved People with Pedophilia and/or Hebephilia

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be better able to:
1) Distinguish between pedophilia and hebephilia
2) Distinguish between paraphilias and paraphilic disorders
3) Explain the basic components of mandatory reporting laws and how these laws can differ from one region to the next
4) Summarize the ethical challenges associated with working with non-justice involved individuals with pedophilia and/or hebephilia
5) Evaluate the need for mandatory reporting based on case vignettes
6) Identify approaches and processes to address the ethical and legal requirements in working with non-justice involved individuals with pedophilia and/or hebephilia

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Distinguish between pedophilia and hebephilia,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Distinguish between paraphilias and paraphilic disorders,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Explain the basic components of mandatory reporting laws and how these laws can differ from one region to the next,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Summarize the ethical challenges associated with working with non-justice involved individuals with pedophilia and/or hebephilia,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Evaluate the need for mandatory reporting based on case vignettes,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Identify approaches and processes to address the ethical and legal requirements in working with non-justice involved individuals with pedophilia and/or hebephilia,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor(s) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all